The Importance of Right View

“Bhikkhus, this is the forerunner, this is the precursor for the arising of the sun, namely dawn. And in just the same way, bhikkhus, this is the forerunner, this is the precursor for wholesome states, namely right view. For one who has right view, right thought occurs. For one with right thought, right speech occurs. For one with right speech, right action occurs. For one with right action, right livelihood occurs. For one with right livelihood, right effort occurs. For one with right effort, right mindfulness occurs. For one with right mindfulness, right concentration occurs. For one with right concentration, right knowledge occurs. For one with right knowledge, right liberation occurs.”

~ Aṅguttara-Nikāya, Book of the Tens, Sutta 121

Right view generally means view that is in accordance with the true nature of reality. It is view that does not contradict but conforms with the true nature of things as they really are, and with the natural order of our universe. When one has acquired right view, one understands things correctly as they actually are. One understands things in conformity with natural laws and, therefore, knows how to order one's life accordingly, enabling one to live one's life in harmony with nature. Living thus one is able to avoid much suffering and increase happiness in one's life. And according to the Buddha's teaching, if one can fully penetrate the relevant truth about the nature of our existential problem of suffering (i.e. the four Noble Truths), then one can even acquire the very clear vision and right view that will enable one to fully transcend all suffering.

Buddhism: Adapting to Change without Losing our Tradition

(NB: In this article Buddhist and Buddhism refer only to Theravāda Buddhist and Theravāda Buddhism respectively.)

The Buddha's teaching at its root is essentially a contemplative one. It deals primarily with the question of dukkha, i.e. the unsatisfactoriness and suffering in our lives. It is a discipline of training our mind in order to achieve liberation from dukkha. In its earliest form there is little that is ritualistic about it. The path to liberation from dukkha requires no rituals whatsoever. What it requires is a dedicated effort to investigate deeply into the nature of dukkha and its cause, to purify one's mind from the cause of dukkha, and thus realise its cessation. This effort is the work of contemplation. And no amount of rituals can accomplish its aim.

But later on this teaching was gradually institutionalised into a religion - Buddhism. And, as with any other religion, rituals become a necessary accompaniment and adornment. There is nothing really bad about turning the Buddha's teaching into a religion. It's a natural progression that takes place when the Dhamma starts to become popular among the general mass. When a big group of people come together for a common purpose to follow the Buddha's teaching, they need a system to organise and regulate their group practise, to impart and share knowledge about the Dhamma, to support each other in their commitment to the practise, and also to serve as their group identity. The religious system, Buddhism, gradually emerged out of this need.

Rituals are part of this system which serve many useful purposes. For example the ritual of recitation and reflection on passages from the scriptures serves to draw out and impress upon the Buddhist devotees the profound meaning of certain aspect of the Buddha's teaching. This promotes understanding and faith. Rituals also give the devotees a very real sense of closeness to the Buddha and his teaching. This promotes faith and dedication to the observance of his teaching. Devotees who participate together in a ritual also feel a sense of belonging to a common cause and community. This promotes fellowship which leads to the devotees supporting each other spiritually and materially in their spiritual quest, which strengthens the community.

In the Buddha's time, he and his core disciples, majority of whom were monks and nuns with contemplative bent, constitute more or less a contemplative movement. There were lay disciples to be sure but they were mostly on the periphery and played mostly supportive role for the core contemplative movement, the Saṅgha. And the majority of these disciples not only strive very hard in their meditative practise but also aim to bring the practise all the way to its conclusion, i.e. the realisation of the cessation of dukkha.

While most of these disciples of the Buddha during his time were satisfied with and could get by just on learning Dhamma and meditation alone, and their faith in the Dhamma is firmly established and affirmed by the profound clarity arising out of their contemplative work, the later non-contemplative masses of Buddhism (the religion), comprising mostly lay people whose aim of a religious life is not so much to strive in meditation practise, much less to realise the final goal of the Dhamma (not in this life anyway), but more to just live their daily life in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma, they needed rituals as an addition to their religious practise to continuously sustain their faith.

Watching Intention - Profound Insight through a Simple Act

One of the basic instructions in the practise of vipassanā meditation is to note the intention that arise prior to any bodily movements. But in carrying out this instruction many meditators "try" very hard to catch the intention before they move their limbs. And often we find that in their eagerness to observe the intention, let's say the intention before lifting the foot in walking meditation, they unwittingly produce the intention and then happily note the intention produced.

Actually this instruction to observe intention means to observe the natural intentions that arise prior to all our bodily movements. In our daily life as we go about our business many bodily movements occur seemingly by itself. We do not seem to consciously and deliberately produce these movements. They occur more out of the force of habits. For example when we approach a door our hand immediately reach for the knob, turn it, and push the door open. All these movements occur automatically out of the force of habit. We do not even think about it. Usually we are not even aware of these insignificant movements. Our mind is probably engrossed in thoughts about something else when these movements occur.

Contemplation is Total Engagement of Mindfulness

When we contemplate an object in vipassanā meditation we really need to give one hundred percent of all our mental resources to the work of contemplating the object in the present moment. The mind needs to be completely immersed with curiosity and interest into the object in the present moment and be totally engaged in investigating its nature.

The normal habit of the mind is to give a little attention here and a little there. Often we think that we are completely with the object in the present moment because it seems that we are able to follow the flow of the objects from moment to moment. But if we really look honestly we will realise that we are not really giving one hundred percent to the object occurring in the present moment.

Samatha and Vipassana Concentration: Some Similes

One way to understand the difference between samatha and vipassanā concentration is to think of samatha concentration as similar to a woodcutter who, when he wishes to take a break from his work, would put aside his axe by driving its sharp wedge into a tree stump, and then sit beside it to rest. Because the wedge of the axe is sharp it is able to cut into the stump effectively. But once it is driven in, the axe just remain there on the stump while the woodcutter takes a tranquil break.

Samatha concentration is like this. Because its jhāna factors (initial-mental-application, sustained-mental-application, joy, bliss, and mental-one-pointedness) are well developed, powerful, and sharp, they are able to penetrate effectively into their object. But once they go in, the mind just remain there, still and unmoving, allowing the meditator to have a peaceful and tranquil rest from the world of sensual objects. This is like the woodcutter taking a break from his work while his axe, normally busy chopping away, is in a state of rest, having been driven into the stump.

Kalama Sutta: Practise Freely or Practise in Accordance with the Dhamma

The Kesamutti Sutta (Aṅguttara-Nikāya, Book of the Threes, Sutta 66), better known as the Kālāma Sutta, is perhaps the most often quoted among the discourses taught by the Buddha. It is often cited to show that the Buddha promoted a spirit of free inquiry among his disciples and did not insist on blind and dogmatic belief. The Sutta has even been dubbed "The Buddha's Charter of Free Inquiry." The ten ways listed in the Sutta by which one should not accept a teaching (see below) as well as the Buddha's call in it to use one's own personal reflection and consideration to decide for oneself what teaching can be accepted and what teaching can be rejected, appear to hold out a promise of religious and thought freedom that is so enticing that it has endeared the Buddha's teaching to many modern, educated, intellectual, and rational minds.

These days, however, there is an increasing number of those who have taken a liking to Buddhism because of this promising spirit of free inquiry embodied in the message of the Sutta, but who at the same time believe, in part due to the far-reaching influence of the ideals of Secular Humanism on our modern society, and in part based on their personal understanding of the message of the Sutta, that one should be totally free and unrestricted in one's approach to the practise of the Dhamma. This belief includes the idea that in practising the Dhamma one should not be restricted by any structure or system at all, not even that of the Dhamma (which the Buddha himself established), and one should be totally free to mould and reshape the Dhamma in ways that one sees fit in order to make its practise more appealing, congenial and relevant for oneself as well as to modern conditions and needs. Some even believe that one should be free to adopt and incorporate without any restriction, ideas and methods outside the Buddha's teaching into the practise of the Dhamma if one finds it desirable.

There are even those who go so far as to believe that one can totally do away with faith in the Dhamma, that one should begin the practise on the basis of scepticism, doubt and question everything until one arrives at the truth; Or one should base one's practise solely on one's personal experience, or even, one's rational reflection, and understanding (read ideas and opinions). Some even propose to do away with fundamental teaching of the Dhamma such as rebirth which cannot be perceive directly in one's daily experience.

But did the Buddha really mean his message to the Kālāmas to be taken in this light? Or how did he mean it to be taken? Let us examine this Sutta to see if we can shed some light on this question.

All Men are Born Equal?: A Discussion on Kamma

Post updated: 30th Aug 2011 (See note under comments)

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal..."

~ United States Declaration of Independence

All men are created equal. This is a very powerful statement and it embodies perhaps the single most potent idea that has captured the imagination of modern civilisations. The idea of equality of all men (and women) has wide ranging influence on and is very entrenched in our modern civilised world, particularly in western societies. It serves as one of the fundamental principles of any democratic institutions and is enshrined in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

The appealing idea expressed by this statement seems pretty obvious and self-explanatory. But let us explore its meaning a bit further in order to try to understand it better. Here of course we are looking from the perspective of one who is a Buddhist. Therefore we have to leave aside the idea of creationism which is implicit in the statement because Buddhists do not subscribe to the idea that the universe and all lives that exist in it was created by a supreme almighty being. Be that as it may be we can still approach a discussion of its meaning generally by replacing the expression created equal with born equal. So instead of saying all men are created equal we can say all men are born equal.

But, when we look at this statement that all human beings are born equal the first question that immediately comes to mind is this: But are all human beings really born equal?